The Politics of Contemporary (Trans)national Commercial Land Deals: Competing Views, Strategies and Alternatives
نویسندگان
چکیده
The phrase ‘global land grab’ has become a catch-all framework to describe and analyze the current explosion of (trans)national commercial land transactions revolving around the production and sale of food and biofuels. Initially deployed and popularised especially by activist groups deeply concerned and opposed to such transactions from an environmental-agrarian justice perspective, the significance of the phrase has quickly moved beyond its original moorings, as it gets absorbed into mainstream development currents. Increasingly, the original stress on how many commercial land transactions are dispossessing rural communities and undermining fragile and diverse ecosystems, has shifted to an emphasis on the economic opportunities opened up by such land deals. While acknowledging the risks, this latter usage now minimizes them by outlining ways to avoid possible negative impacts, for instance, through such notionally ‘pro-poor’ land measures as the promotion of secure land tenure and efficient land governance. Taking off from the basic proposition that the very logic of corporate-driven food-biofuel production and consumption is exclusionary and unsustainable, this paper attempts to go beyond the confines of the mainstream development
منابع مشابه
Towards a Broader View of the Politics of Global Land Grab: Rethinking Land Issues, Reframing Resistance
The phrase 'global land grab' has become a catch-all framework to describe and analyze the current explosion of (trans)national commercial land transactions related to the production and sale of food and biofuels. Initially deployed and popularised by activist groups opposed to such transactions from an environmental and agrarian justice perspectives, the significance of the phrase has quickly ...
متن کاملA Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Movements in Indonesia and the Islamic Revolution in Iran
Throughout history until today, the Islamic world has been witness to various movements which have been formed in response to special demands. The current article aims to address the similarities and differences between the political thought[1] of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and two movements in Indonesia namely the Nahdatul Ulama (NU) and the Muhammadiyah movements using a descriptive-compa...
متن کاملThe Challenge of Global Governance of Land Grabbing: Changing International Agricultural Context and Competing Political Views and Strategies
The emergence of ‘flex crops and commodities’ within a fluid international food regime transition, the rise of BRICS and middle-income countries, and the revalued role of nation-states are critical context for land grabbing. These global transformations that shape and are reshaped by contemporary land grabbing have resulted in the emergence of competing interpretations of the meaning of such ch...
متن کاملIntentionality, Politics, And Religion
The idea that intentionality is the distinctive mark of the mental or that only mental phenomena have intentionality emerged in the philosophical tradition after Franz Brentano. Much of contemporary philosophy is dedicated to a rejection of the view that mental phenomena have original intentionality. In other words, main strands of contemporary philosophy seek to naturalize intentionality of th...
متن کاملEvaluating Optimal Anti-Desertification Alternatives, Using Special Vector Technique and Bernardo Ranking Model
Introduction: Desertification is the process of ecological and biological reduction of land potential in a natural or unnatural way, mainly affecting arid regions. Moreover, it decreases land efficiency with increasing acceleration. Land resources and human populations exposed to desertification and land destruction are prone to various threats, including loss of land productivity, food insecur...
متن کامل